Network
Launch Date
Consensus
Note
Sepolia
Oct 2021
PoW
Like-for-like representation of Ethereum
Görli
Jan 2019
PoA
Proof-of-Authority
Kiln
Mar 2022
PoS
Post-Merge (for ETH2), shadow fork of the mainnet
Kintsugi
Dec 2021
PoS
DEPRECATED, use Kiln; post-Merge (for ETH2)
Ropsten
Nov 2016
PoW
DEPRECATED, use Sepolia; the Merge to happen on Jun 8, 2022
Rinkeby
Apr 2017
PoA
DEPRECATED, use Görli and Görli Faucet
Kovan
Mar 2017
PoA
DEPRECATED, use Sepolia or Görli
List of active and deprecated Ethereum testnets, including Kintsugi.
Features
Optimistic rollup 
ZK-rollup 
Proof
Uses fraud proofs to prove transaction validity. 
Uses validity (zero-knowledge) proofs to prove transaction validity. 
Capital efficiency
Requires waiting through a 1-week delay (dispute period) before withdrawing funds. 
Users can withdraw funds immediately because validity proofs provide incontrovertible evidence of the authenticity of off-chain transactions. 
Data compression
Publishes full transaction data as calldata to Ethereum Mainnet, which increases rollup costs. 
Doesn't need to publish transaction data on Ethereum because ZK-SNARKs and ZK-STARKs already guarantee the accuracy of the rollup state. 
EVM compatibility
Uses a simulation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which allows it to run arbitrary logic and support smart contracts. 
Doesn't widely support EVM computation, although a few EVM-compatible ZK-rollups have appeared. 
Rollup costs
Reduces costs since it publishes minimal data on Ethereum and doesn't have to post proofs for transactions, except in special circumstances. 
Faces higher overhead from costs involved in generating and verifying proofs for every transaction block. ZK proofs require specialized, expensive hardware to create and have high on-chain verification costs. 
Trust assumptions
Doesn't require a trusted setup. 
Requires a trusted setup to work. 
Liveness requirements
Verifiers are needed to keep tabs on the actual rollup state and the one referenced in the state root to detect fraud. 
Users don't need someone to watch the L2 chain to detect fraud. 
Security properties 
Relies on cryptoeconomic incentives to assure users of rollup security. 
Relies on cryptographic guarantees for security. 
Start building
on Alchemy.
Sign up for free
Start building on Optimism.
Sign up for free
Start building on Arbitrum.
Sign up for free
Start building on Ethereum.
Sign up for free
Start building on Polygon.
Sign up for free
Start building on Starknet.
Sign up for free
Start building on Flow.
Sign up for free
kiln faucet
Get free Kiln ETH.
Start building today
Goerli faucet
Get free Goerli ETH.
Start building today
SEPOLIA FAUCET
Get free Sepolia ETH.
Start Building Today
mumbai faucet
Get free Mumbai Matic.
Start building today
rinkeby faucet
Get free Rinkeby
ETH.
Start building today
Start building on Ethereum.
Get started for free
Start building on Ethereum.
Get started for free
Start building on Flow.
Get started for free
Start building on Polygon.
Get started for free
Start building on Starknet.
Get started for free
Start building on Optimism.
Get started for free
Start building on Solana.
Get started for free
Start building on Solana.
Sign up for beta access
Start building on Solana.
Join the waitlist
Arbitrum logo
Start building on Arbitrum.
Get started for free
Build with Alchemy's
Gas Manager & Bundler APIs
Learn
Solidity at
Alchemy
University
Get started today
Build with Alchemy's
Gas Manager & Bundler APIs
curl 
https://release.solana.com/v1.10.32/solana-install-init-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.exe 
--output 
C:\solana-install-tmp\solana-install-init.exe 
--create-dirs
Layer 2
What are RaaS?

What are Rollups-as-a-service (RaaS)?

Learn About Where Rollups as a Service Fit In The Ethereum Layer 2 Ecosystem
Last Updated:
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) offers a layer of abstraction over Rollup frameworks and SDKs to make it easy to deploy, maintain, and build on top of custom, production-grade application-specific rollups (AppRollups).

RaaS empowers developers to focus on building the application layer, turning what used to take multiple engineers dozens of hours into a 10 minute no-code deployment process.

To understand RaaS, we first need to establish some definitions. For the purposes of this article, we’ll assume readers have a basic understanding of L1s, sidechains, and general purpose L2 rollups (eg. Optimism and Arbitrum).

What are Appchains?

An application-specific blockchain, or appchain, is a blockchain dedicated to serve and operate one specific application instead of multiple apps like a public blockchain.

In this way, appchains offer a more sustainable long-term approach to scaling applications while enabling web3 developers to exercise greater freedom over economic structure, governance structure, and consensus algorithm for their apps.

A year ago, app developers faced three primary choices when deciding where they wanted to deploy their application: 

1. Public L1s or Sidechains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon

2. Shared general-purpose L2 rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum

3. L1 appchain networks like Cosmos

Each of these came with a unique set of tradeoffs that we’ll discuss below. Fortunately, we now have more advanced alternatives thanks in large part to Rollup SDKs.

What are Rollup SDKs?

Rollup SDKs are frameworks for developers to build customized rollups from scratch.

In practice, this enables any developer to create their own new, dedicated application-specific rollup (AppRollup) based on the same underlying software as leading general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism. As such, popular rollup SDK providers include Arbitrum Orbit, the OP Stack, and Rollkit.

AppRollups built with Rollup SDKs combine the customizability and flexibility of dedicated appchains with the security and scalability of general purpose rollups.

Unfortunately, building effective AppRollups using Rollup SDKs requires intensive infrastructure engineering along with a comprehensive knowledge of all pieces involved in the modular stack to ensure the final infrastructure best suits the unique needs of the application.

That’s where RaaS comes in to help.

What are RaaS Providers?

In addition to deployment, RaaS providers like Caldera, Ankr, or Dymension work with developers to tailor AppRollups to fit their specific use-case through custom data availability and settlement layers, fee payments, and even native gas tokens.

Deploying a custom AppRollup through the Rollup SDKs requires teams to build support tools like testnet faucets, block explorers, and bridge interfaces. Most RaaS providers create these tools for every chain through their service, along with continued support with infrastructure-related needs in perpetuity.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 blockchains?

While deploying on top of an existing public L1 comes with strong security guarantees and robust resources, the nature of sharing blockspace with dozens of other applications inevitably hurts performance, raises user transaction costs, and limits customizability.

As an L1 network and its applications grow in popularity, so do costs and processing speeds.

For example, block times on Caldera chains will take 10-100 milliseconds on average compared to 10-12 seconds on Ethereum.

In order to combat the scaling issue, the development of more rollups which provide sufficient scalability while still preserving the security of the underlying base chain, has become commonplace. 

RaaS providers enable developers to leverage the security of a base layer such as Ethereum, and enjoy the customizability of a dedicated appchain, all while maintaining EVM-compatibility and access to popular developer tools.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to Layer 2 Networks?

Like public L1s, every dApp deployed on top of an Ethereum L2 (including general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism) is forced to share computational resources with all the other dApps on that rollup, leading to inevitable battles for the limited blockspace.

These shared networks also lack customizability in comparison to RaaS, as they’re meant to serve a wide range of usecases rather than optimize for a single one.

Imagine a blockchain based video game that needs quick settlement time and is ok with a centralized sequencer. For this team, a RaaS makes much more sense than sharing blockspace on a general purpose L2.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 appchains like Cosmos?

The limited blockspace and lack of customizability mentioned above have contributed to the rise of application-specific blockchains through frameworks like the Cosmos ecosystem, Polygon Superchains, and Avalanche Subnets.

The trouble is that these L1 appchains require developer teams to bootstrap their own validator network for security, despite possessing far smaller developer communities with fewer resources and tooling.

In contrast, RaaS solutions are able to inherit security from their settlement layers, while abstracting away difficult infrastructure engineering and providing developers access to the full suite of EVM tooling.

What are the benefits & tradeoffs of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

RaaS represents a new status quo in Web3 infrastructure, enabling developers to deploy custom, performant AppRollups in the click of a button without the hassle and cost of intensive infrastructure engineering.

The primary tradeoff for working with a RaaS provider at the moment is the lack of liquidity that you’d face with any new appchain.

As expected, public general-purpose chains like Ethereum will almost always have more liquidity across its network due to the sheer number of applications and users operating all at once.

However, for RaaS: the edge in performance enables a smoother user-experience, the customizations allow for more sustainable revenue generation (through MEV optimization, sequencer fee collection, etc), and the bridge interfaces make it easy for users to transfer funds from large public chains onto the AppRollups.

These features should render any immediate lack of liquidity insignificant in the long term for most successful projects.

What are the use cases of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

Because of the customizability, RaaS is a great infrastructure solution for nearly any application that plans to build at scale. These include on-chain gaming, DeFi applications, and a variety of consumer & enterprise protocols.

ALCHEMY SUPERNODE - ETHEREUM NODE API

Scale to any size, without any errors

Alchemy Supernode finally makes it possible to scale blockchain applications without all the headaches. Plus, our legendary support will guide you every step of the way.

Get started for free
Supernode footer
Layer 2
What are RaaS?

What are Rollups-as-a-service (RaaS)?

Learn About Where Rollups as a Service Fit In The Ethereum Layer 2 Ecosystem
Last Updated:
Last Updated:
March 14, 2023
Don't miss an update
Sign up for our newsletter to get alpha, key insights, and killer resources.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Table of Contents

Talk to an Expert

Learn how Alchemy's blockchain developer tools can help your business succeed in web3!
Valid number
Thank you! An Alchemy expert will be in touch with you shortly!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) offers a layer of abstraction over Rollup frameworks and SDKs to make it easy to deploy, maintain, and build on top of custom, production-grade application-specific rollups (AppRollups).

RaaS empowers developers to focus on building the application layer, turning what used to take multiple engineers dozens of hours into a 10 minute no-code deployment process.

To understand RaaS, we first need to establish some definitions. For the purposes of this article, we’ll assume readers have a basic understanding of L1s, sidechains, and general purpose L2 rollups (eg. Optimism and Arbitrum).

What are Appchains?

An application-specific blockchain, or appchain, is a blockchain dedicated to serve and operate one specific application instead of multiple apps like a public blockchain.

In this way, appchains offer a more sustainable long-term approach to scaling applications while enabling web3 developers to exercise greater freedom over economic structure, governance structure, and consensus algorithm for their apps.

A year ago, app developers faced three primary choices when deciding where they wanted to deploy their application: 

1. Public L1s or Sidechains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon

2. Shared general-purpose L2 rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum

3. L1 appchain networks like Cosmos

Each of these came with a unique set of tradeoffs that we’ll discuss below. Fortunately, we now have more advanced alternatives thanks in large part to Rollup SDKs.

What are Rollup SDKs?

Rollup SDKs are frameworks for developers to build customized rollups from scratch.

In practice, this enables any developer to create their own new, dedicated application-specific rollup (AppRollup) based on the same underlying software as leading general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism. As such, popular rollup SDK providers include Arbitrum Orbit, the OP Stack, and Rollkit.

AppRollups built with Rollup SDKs combine the customizability and flexibility of dedicated appchains with the security and scalability of general purpose rollups.

Unfortunately, building effective AppRollups using Rollup SDKs requires intensive infrastructure engineering along with a comprehensive knowledge of all pieces involved in the modular stack to ensure the final infrastructure best suits the unique needs of the application.

That’s where RaaS comes in to help.

What are RaaS Providers?

In addition to deployment, RaaS providers like Caldera, Ankr, or Dymension work with developers to tailor AppRollups to fit their specific use-case through custom data availability and settlement layers, fee payments, and even native gas tokens.

Deploying a custom AppRollup through the Rollup SDKs requires teams to build support tools like testnet faucets, block explorers, and bridge interfaces. Most RaaS providers create these tools for every chain through their service, along with continued support with infrastructure-related needs in perpetuity.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 blockchains?

While deploying on top of an existing public L1 comes with strong security guarantees and robust resources, the nature of sharing blockspace with dozens of other applications inevitably hurts performance, raises user transaction costs, and limits customizability.

As an L1 network and its applications grow in popularity, so do costs and processing speeds.

For example, block times on Caldera chains will take 10-100 milliseconds on average compared to 10-12 seconds on Ethereum.

In order to combat the scaling issue, the development of more rollups which provide sufficient scalability while still preserving the security of the underlying base chain, has become commonplace. 

RaaS providers enable developers to leverage the security of a base layer such as Ethereum, and enjoy the customizability of a dedicated appchain, all while maintaining EVM-compatibility and access to popular developer tools.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to Layer 2 Networks?

Like public L1s, every dApp deployed on top of an Ethereum L2 (including general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism) is forced to share computational resources with all the other dApps on that rollup, leading to inevitable battles for the limited blockspace.

These shared networks also lack customizability in comparison to RaaS, as they’re meant to serve a wide range of usecases rather than optimize for a single one.

Imagine a blockchain based video game that needs quick settlement time and is ok with a centralized sequencer. For this team, a RaaS makes much more sense than sharing blockspace on a general purpose L2.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 appchains like Cosmos?

The limited blockspace and lack of customizability mentioned above have contributed to the rise of application-specific blockchains through frameworks like the Cosmos ecosystem, Polygon Superchains, and Avalanche Subnets.

The trouble is that these L1 appchains require developer teams to bootstrap their own validator network for security, despite possessing far smaller developer communities with fewer resources and tooling.

In contrast, RaaS solutions are able to inherit security from their settlement layers, while abstracting away difficult infrastructure engineering and providing developers access to the full suite of EVM tooling.

What are the benefits & tradeoffs of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

RaaS represents a new status quo in Web3 infrastructure, enabling developers to deploy custom, performant AppRollups in the click of a button without the hassle and cost of intensive infrastructure engineering.

The primary tradeoff for working with a RaaS provider at the moment is the lack of liquidity that you’d face with any new appchain.

As expected, public general-purpose chains like Ethereum will almost always have more liquidity across its network due to the sheer number of applications and users operating all at once.

However, for RaaS: the edge in performance enables a smoother user-experience, the customizations allow for more sustainable revenue generation (through MEV optimization, sequencer fee collection, etc), and the bridge interfaces make it easy for users to transfer funds from large public chains onto the AppRollups.

These features should render any immediate lack of liquidity insignificant in the long term for most successful projects.

What are the use cases of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

Because of the customizability, RaaS is a great infrastructure solution for nearly any application that plans to build at scale. These include on-chain gaming, DeFi applications, and a variety of consumer & enterprise protocols.

Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) offers a layer of abstraction over Rollup frameworks and SDKs to make it easy to deploy, maintain, and build on top of custom, production-grade application-specific rollups (AppRollups).

RaaS empowers developers to focus on building the application layer, turning what used to take multiple engineers dozens of hours into a 10 minute no-code deployment process.

To understand RaaS, we first need to establish some definitions. For the purposes of this article, we’ll assume readers have a basic understanding of L1s, sidechains, and general purpose L2 rollups (eg. Optimism and Arbitrum).

What are Appchains?

An application-specific blockchain, or appchain, is a blockchain dedicated to serve and operate one specific application instead of multiple apps like a public blockchain.

In this way, appchains offer a more sustainable long-term approach to scaling applications while enabling web3 developers to exercise greater freedom over economic structure, governance structure, and consensus algorithm for their apps.

A year ago, app developers faced three primary choices when deciding where they wanted to deploy their application: 

1. Public L1s or Sidechains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon

2. Shared general-purpose L2 rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum

3. L1 appchain networks like Cosmos

Each of these came with a unique set of tradeoffs that we’ll discuss below. Fortunately, we now have more advanced alternatives thanks in large part to Rollup SDKs.

What are Rollup SDKs?

Rollup SDKs are frameworks for developers to build customized rollups from scratch.

In practice, this enables any developer to create their own new, dedicated application-specific rollup (AppRollup) based on the same underlying software as leading general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism. As such, popular rollup SDK providers include Arbitrum Orbit, the OP Stack, and Rollkit.

AppRollups built with Rollup SDKs combine the customizability and flexibility of dedicated appchains with the security and scalability of general purpose rollups.

Unfortunately, building effective AppRollups using Rollup SDKs requires intensive infrastructure engineering along with a comprehensive knowledge of all pieces involved in the modular stack to ensure the final infrastructure best suits the unique needs of the application.

That’s where RaaS comes in to help.

What are RaaS Providers?

In addition to deployment, RaaS providers like Caldera, Ankr, or Dymension work with developers to tailor AppRollups to fit their specific use-case through custom data availability and settlement layers, fee payments, and even native gas tokens.

Deploying a custom AppRollup through the Rollup SDKs requires teams to build support tools like testnet faucets, block explorers, and bridge interfaces. Most RaaS providers create these tools for every chain through their service, along with continued support with infrastructure-related needs in perpetuity.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 blockchains?

While deploying on top of an existing public L1 comes with strong security guarantees and robust resources, the nature of sharing blockspace with dozens of other applications inevitably hurts performance, raises user transaction costs, and limits customizability.

As an L1 network and its applications grow in popularity, so do costs and processing speeds.

For example, block times on Caldera chains will take 10-100 milliseconds on average compared to 10-12 seconds on Ethereum.

In order to combat the scaling issue, the development of more rollups which provide sufficient scalability while still preserving the security of the underlying base chain, has become commonplace. 

RaaS providers enable developers to leverage the security of a base layer such as Ethereum, and enjoy the customizability of a dedicated appchain, all while maintaining EVM-compatibility and access to popular developer tools.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to Layer 2 Networks?

Like public L1s, every dApp deployed on top of an Ethereum L2 (including general purpose rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism) is forced to share computational resources with all the other dApps on that rollup, leading to inevitable battles for the limited blockspace.

These shared networks also lack customizability in comparison to RaaS, as they’re meant to serve a wide range of usecases rather than optimize for a single one.

Imagine a blockchain based video game that needs quick settlement time and is ok with a centralized sequencer. For this team, a RaaS makes much more sense than sharing blockspace on a general purpose L2.

How do Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) compare to L1 appchains like Cosmos?

The limited blockspace and lack of customizability mentioned above have contributed to the rise of application-specific blockchains through frameworks like the Cosmos ecosystem, Polygon Superchains, and Avalanche Subnets.

The trouble is that these L1 appchains require developer teams to bootstrap their own validator network for security, despite possessing far smaller developer communities with fewer resources and tooling.

In contrast, RaaS solutions are able to inherit security from their settlement layers, while abstracting away difficult infrastructure engineering and providing developers access to the full suite of EVM tooling.

What are the benefits & tradeoffs of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

RaaS represents a new status quo in Web3 infrastructure, enabling developers to deploy custom, performant AppRollups in the click of a button without the hassle and cost of intensive infrastructure engineering.

The primary tradeoff for working with a RaaS provider at the moment is the lack of liquidity that you’d face with any new appchain.

As expected, public general-purpose chains like Ethereum will almost always have more liquidity across its network due to the sheer number of applications and users operating all at once.

However, for RaaS: the edge in performance enables a smoother user-experience, the customizations allow for more sustainable revenue generation (through MEV optimization, sequencer fee collection, etc), and the bridge interfaces make it easy for users to transfer funds from large public chains onto the AppRollups.

These features should render any immediate lack of liquidity insignificant in the long term for most successful projects.

What are the use cases of Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS)?

Because of the customizability, RaaS is a great infrastructure solution for nearly any application that plans to build at scale. These include on-chain gaming, DeFi applications, and a variety of consumer & enterprise protocols.

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Contact Us

Talk to an expert at Alchemy to answer all of your product questions.
Valid number
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Build blockchain magic with Alchemy

Alchemy combines the most powerful web3 developer products and tools with resources, community and legendary support.

Get started for free