Network
Launch Date
Consensus
Note
Sepolia
Oct 2021
PoW
Like-for-like representation of Ethereum
Görli
Jan 2019
PoA
Proof-of-Authority
Kiln
Mar 2022
PoS
Post-Merge (for ETH2), shadow fork of the mainnet
Kintsugi
Dec 2021
PoS
DEPRECATED, use Kiln; post-Merge (for ETH2)
Ropsten
Nov 2016
PoW
DEPRECATED, use Sepolia; the Merge to happen on Jun 8, 2022
Rinkeby
Apr 2017
PoA
DEPRECATED, use Görli and Görli Faucet
Kovan
Mar 2017
PoA
DEPRECATED, use Sepolia or Görli
List of active and deprecated Ethereum testnets, including Kintsugi.
Features
Optimistic rollup 
ZK-rollup 
Proof
Uses fraud proofs to prove transaction validity. 
Uses validity (zero-knowledge) proofs to prove transaction validity. 
Capital efficiency
Requires waiting through a 1-week delay (dispute period) before withdrawing funds. 
Users can withdraw funds immediately because validity proofs provide incontrovertible evidence of the authenticity of off-chain transactions. 
Data compression
Publishes full transaction data as calldata to Ethereum Mainnet, which increases rollup costs. 
Doesn't need to publish transaction data on Ethereum because ZK-SNARKs and ZK-STARKs already guarantee the accuracy of the rollup state. 
EVM compatibility
Uses a simulation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which allows it to run arbitrary logic and support smart contracts. 
Doesn't widely support EVM computation, although a few EVM-compatible ZK-rollups have appeared. 
Rollup costs
Reduces costs since it publishes minimal data on Ethereum and doesn't have to post proofs for transactions, except in special circumstances. 
Faces higher overhead from costs involved in generating and verifying proofs for every transaction block. ZK proofs require specialized, expensive hardware to create and have high on-chain verification costs. 
Trust assumptions
Doesn't require a trusted setup. 
Requires a trusted setup to work. 
Liveness requirements
Verifiers are needed to keep tabs on the actual rollup state and the one referenced in the state root to detect fraud. 
Users don't need someone to watch the L2 chain to detect fraud. 
Security properties 
Relies on cryptoeconomic incentives to assure users of rollup security. 
Relies on cryptographic guarantees for security. 
Start building
on Alchemy.
Sign up for free
Start building on Optimism.
Sign up for free
Start building on Arbitrum.
Sign up for free
Start building on Ethereum.
Sign up for free
Start building on Polygon.
Sign up for free
Start building on Starknet.
Sign up for free
Start building on Flow.
Sign up for free
kiln faucet
Get free Kiln ETH.
Start building today
Goerli faucet
Get free Goerli ETH.
Start building today
SEPOLIA FAUCET
Get free Sepolia ETH.
Start Building Today
mumbai faucet
Get free Mumbai Matic.
Start building today
rinkeby faucet
Get free Rinkeby
ETH.
Start building today
Start building on Ethereum.
Get started for free
Start building on Ethereum.
Get started for free
Start building on Flow.
Get started for free
Start building on Polygon.
Get started for free
Start building on Starknet.
Get started for free
Start building on Optimism.
Get started for free
Start building on Solana.
Get started for free
Start building on Solana.
Sign up for beta access
Start building on Solana.
Join the waitlist
Arbitrum logo
Start building on Arbitrum.
Get started for free
Build with Alchemy's
Gas Manager & Bundler APIs
Learn
Solidity at
Alchemy
University
Get started today
Build with Alchemy's
Gas Manager & Bundler APIs
curl 
https://release.solana.com/v1.10.32/solana-install-init-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.exe 
--output 
C:\solana-install-tmp\solana-install-init.exe 
--create-dirs
Infra
enterprise blockchain

How to Choose an Enterprise Blockchain Infrastructure Partner

Learn About Enterprise Grade Blockchain Infrastructure to Support Your Businesses Specific Needs
Last Updated:
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Adding blockchain into your tech stack is an important part of future-proofing any business. In the early 2000’s, it was commonplace to differentiate “internet” companies” from the others, but today all companies use the internet. Similarly, blockchain technology is disruptive to most businesses and most capital markets, which is why applications leveraging it are often referred to as “Web3”.

Blockchain stands to unlock trillions of dollars of illiquid capital into the market as well as provide alternatives to the advertising-centric business model employed by most technology companies. Businesses must choose partners with the experience and knowledge to navigate the opportunities effectively.

This guide aims to help you choose blockchain infrastructure companies that offer comprehensive products to support your business goals and user requirements.

What are the different types of blockchain infrastructure providers companies should evaluate?

Blockchain infrastructure providers offer solutions at every part of the web3 developer stack; from RPC node providers that let engineers read and write to the blockchain to Wallets-as-a-Service providers that give businesses a streamlined way to offer their customers web3 wallets.

1. Wallet Solutions

Wallets give users control of their digital assets and allow them to participate in the web3 economy. With a wallet, people can borrow and lend on DeFi apps, mint and display NFTs, play games, and participate in consumer loyalty and membership programs, all while keeping their assets secure. 

For many years, EOA (“Externally Owned Account”) wallets that rely on seed phrases for recovery have dominated the market; however, new types of wallets that improve the user experience without reducing security and privacy, including Wallet-as-a-Service providers, are gaining a lot of traction. 

Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) MPC wallets, smart contract wallets, and MPC wallets that incorporate Account Abstraction (MPC + AA) offer simpler onboarding for new users by removing the need for recovery phrases and reducing the level of technical knowledge needed to interact with web3.

Account Abstraction: The Most Seamless User Experience

The new Account Abstraction primitive has arrived to ease the transition into web3 - no longer is the onboarding experience plagued by confusing private key requirements that bankrupt forever if you forget your seed phrase.

Solutions such as Alchemy's Account Kit provide all the tools necessary to onboard your users to blockchain without them even knowing: social and passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

With integrations for signers like Portal, enterprises can use Account Kit to create embedded smart wallets that support social login, passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

2. Custody Solutions

Custodians are third-party vendors that provide secure storage and management of private keys on behalf of individuals and institutions. Custodians offer robust security and technical knowledge to entities that are required to use outside vendors or prefer to pay for key management services instead of managing operations internally. 

Custodians typically use cold storage (i.e. keys are held offline), to reduce attack vectors from hackers, and require institutions to go through KYC and other anti-money laundering checks before they can be onboarded as a customer. 

The availability of custodians—particularly licensed ones—is critical for institutional adoption of web3, as they provide infrastructure and compliance frameworks required by traditional financial institutions. 

3. RPC Node Providers

RPC node providers provide the infrastructure that allows web3 applications to interact with blockchain networks by either querying data or submitting transactions. Although it is possible for anyone to host an RPC node, many solo developers and companies prefer to use enterprise-grade RPC node providers to run and scale the infrastructure.

By offering core APIs, enhanced APIs, and a user-friendly developer platform, RPC node providers simplify the development process, allowing engineers to focus on building applications without worrying about infrastructure.

4. Web3 Development Platform

Building decentralized applications that run on public blockchains requires developers to learn a new set of tools and design patterns, and terminology. Choosing the right vendor as your Blockchain Development platform can accelerate your time to market by combining many developer tools into a single, easy-to-understand user interface. 

If a development platform’s tech stack creates too much friction for engineers, builders may take a long time to build applications, abandon projects, or have a bad developer experience.

What features should be considered when choosing a blockchain infrastructure provider?

The features offered by blockchain infrastructure vendors depend on your product scope and goals. There are a few common areas to evaluate including features that support usability, security, composability, and scalability.

1. Usability

Any blockchain tool you choose for your web3 stack should be easy to learn, simple to use, and robust in its ability to satisfy your intents. Platforms should have clear documentation, a professional user experience, and enterprise-grade functionality to support your team’s goals today and in the future.

2. Organizational Security

Blockchain applications carry new types of risks like protocol risk, smart contract risk, and traditional types of risk like organizational controls. Before signing an agreement with a new vendor, review your prospective partner’s security:

  • SOC II certification
  • System testing and resiliency
  • Penetration testing reports
  • External security audits
  • Documented security controls

3. Composability

Composability is a feature in web3 that enables companies to interact with public, open-source applications, APIs, and smart contracts (i.e. flexible and extensible building blocks that make web3 products easier to build).

When choosing a vendor, consider how well your vendor’s product suite composes with other products and tools you plan to use in your stack (e.g. IDEs, debugging tools, etc).

An infrastructure partner should make it easy to include the specific capabilities that fit your needs without requiring developers to implement every feature. For instance, an end-to-end web3 connectivity provider like Portal enables account management functionality like setting up new users, backup, and recovery options. They also support wallet management flows like sending, receiving, storing, and swapping assets. 

That might be enough for your build, but if you want to build a dapp store, connect to browser-only apps, or integrate natively to protocols, you have the option to do so with Portal’s SDK without additional backend integrations.

4. Feature Roadmap

Blockchain infrastructure platforms are evolving to meet emerging needs of web3 developers, and selecting the right partner should also be based on the partner’s planned roadmap to improving and expanding their product offerings.

Product expansion could include features that expand use cases to new verticals (e.g. exchanges, fintech, cross border payments, self-sovereign identity), or to more niche use cases within existing verticals (e.g. NFT sales, etc.)

The goal of researching the feature set of an infrastructure partner is to determine whether or not they can service your product’s baseline feature set, can scale to meet greater demand, and grow to support expanded use cases.

What questions should companies ask blockchain infrastructure providers?

Questions that companies should ask potential blockchain infra providers fall into a few different categories: team, experience, support, and roadmap.

1. Team, clients, and backers

Before choosing a vendor, ask questions to gauge the quality of the team you are evaluating:

  • What experience does the product engineering team have?
  • What experience does the leadership team have?
  • Who are their current customers and what do they say about them?
  • What kinds of partnerships does the vendor have?
  • Who are the company’s investors and advisors?

2. Quality of technology and developer experience

Before selecting a vendor’s products, ask questions to evaluate the quality of the team’s tech stack:

  • What is the architecture of the technology?
  • Have large customers churned or publicly disclosed negative experiences with the company?
  • Is the technology audited and secure?
  • What is the quality and clarity of the product’s documentation?
  • For Wallet-as-a-Service providers, can users “eject their wallets," (i.e. export their private keys?)

3. Customer support and relationship management

Before entering into an agreement with a software vendor, qualify the team’s ability to support your relationship:

  • What channels does the vendor use to communicate with your teams?
  • Does the team offer direct communication with engineers and technical support staff?
  • Does the company have a robust ticketing, observability, and status reporting system?
  • Is technical support available in a timely manner, particularly when there are severe problems?
  • Is the vendor responsive to feedback and product change requests?

4. Vendor product timeline and roadmap

Before picking a blockchain infra partner, assess the product management team’s product roadmap:

  • What features are being planned in the near-term and long-term?
  • How quickly can a comprehensive product be launched with them?
  • How easily can customers suggest product features and requests?
  • What is the team’s shipping velocity with new products and features?
  • What is the team’s process for releasing products in alpha, beta, and general access phases?

Asking questions of sales leaders, product managers, and engineers while judging the fit of a new blockchain infrastructure partner is essential to getting a web3 product to market.

Additionally, companies should try the products, get demos, read documentation, watch tutorials, and talk to current customers to analyze if the vendor they’re evaluating is the right choice for their use case. Although completing due diligence requires a lot of research and time, a thorough process can save time, money, and resources.

ALCHEMY SUPERNODE - ETHEREUM NODE API

Scale to any size, without any errors

Alchemy Supernode finally makes it possible to scale blockchain applications without all the headaches. Plus, our legendary support will guide you every step of the way.

Get started for free
Supernode footer
Infra
enterprise blockchain

How to Choose an Enterprise-Grade Blockchain Infrastructure Partner

Learn About Enterprise Grade Blockchain Infrastructure to Support Your Businesses Specific Needs
Last Updated:
Last Updated:
August 24, 2022
Don't miss an update
Sign up for our newsletter to get alpha, key insights, and killer resources.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Table of Contents

Talk to an Expert

Learn how Alchemy's blockchain developer tools can help your business succeed in web3!
Valid number
Thank you! An Alchemy expert will be in touch with you shortly!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Table of Contents

Adding blockchain into your tech stack is an important part of future-proofing any business. In the early 2000’s, it was commonplace to differentiate “internet” companies” from the others, but today all companies use the internet. Similarly, blockchain technology is disruptive to most businesses and most capital markets, which is why applications leveraging it are often referred to as “Web3”.

Blockchain stands to unlock trillions of dollars of illiquid capital into the market as well as provide alternatives to the advertising-centric business model employed by most technology companies. Businesses must choose partners with the experience and knowledge to navigate the opportunities effectively.

This guide aims to help you choose blockchain infrastructure companies that offer comprehensive products to support your business goals and user requirements.

What are the different types of blockchain infrastructure providers companies should evaluate?

Blockchain infrastructure providers offer solutions at every part of the web3 developer stack; from RPC node providers that let engineers read and write to the blockchain to Wallets-as-a-Service providers that give businesses a streamlined way to offer their customers web3 wallets.

1. Wallet Solutions

Wallets give users control of their digital assets and allow them to participate in the web3 economy. With a wallet, people can borrow and lend on DeFi apps, mint and display NFTs, play games, and participate in consumer loyalty and membership programs, all while keeping their assets secure. 

For many years, EOA (“Externally Owned Account”) wallets that rely on seed phrases for recovery have dominated the market; however, new types of wallets that improve the user experience without reducing security and privacy, including Wallet-as-a-Service providers, are gaining a lot of traction. 

Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) MPC wallets, smart contract wallets, and MPC wallets that incorporate Account Abstraction (MPC + AA) offer simpler onboarding for new users by removing the need for recovery phrases and reducing the level of technical knowledge needed to interact with web3.

Account Abstraction: The Most Seamless User Experience

The new Account Abstraction primitive has arrived to ease the transition into web3 - no longer is the onboarding experience plagued by confusing private key requirements that bankrupt forever if you forget your seed phrase.

Solutions such as Alchemy's Account Kit provide all the tools necessary to onboard your users to blockchain without them even knowing: social and passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

With integrations for signers like Portal, enterprises can use Account Kit to create embedded smart wallets that support social login, passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

2. Custody Solutions

Custodians are third-party vendors that provide secure storage and management of private keys on behalf of individuals and institutions. Custodians offer robust security and technical knowledge to entities that are required to use outside vendors or prefer to pay for key management services instead of managing operations internally. 

Custodians typically use cold storage (i.e. keys are held offline), to reduce attack vectors from hackers, and require institutions to go through KYC and other anti-money laundering checks before they can be onboarded as a customer. 

The availability of custodians—particularly licensed ones—is critical for institutional adoption of web3, as they provide infrastructure and compliance frameworks required by traditional financial institutions. 

3. RPC Node Providers

RPC node providers provide the infrastructure that allows web3 applications to interact with blockchain networks by either querying data or submitting transactions. Although it is possible for anyone to host an RPC node, many solo developers and companies prefer to use enterprise-grade RPC node providers to run and scale the infrastructure.

By offering core APIs, enhanced APIs, and a user-friendly developer platform, RPC node providers simplify the development process, allowing engineers to focus on building applications without worrying about infrastructure.

4. Web3 Development Platform

Building decentralized applications that run on public blockchains requires developers to learn a new set of tools and design patterns, and terminology. Choosing the right vendor as your Blockchain Development platform can accelerate your time to market by combining many developer tools into a single, easy-to-understand user interface. 

If a development platform’s tech stack creates too much friction for engineers, builders may take a long time to build applications, abandon projects, or have a bad developer experience.

What features should be considered when choosing a blockchain infrastructure provider?

The features offered by blockchain infrastructure vendors depend on your product scope and goals. There are a few common areas to evaluate including features that support usability, security, composability, and scalability.

1. Usability

Any blockchain tool you choose for your web3 stack should be easy to learn, simple to use, and robust in its ability to satisfy your intents. Platforms should have clear documentation, a professional user experience, and enterprise-grade functionality to support your team’s goals today and in the future.

2. Organizational Security

Blockchain applications carry new types of risks like protocol risk, smart contract risk, and traditional types of risk like organizational controls. Before signing an agreement with a new vendor, review your prospective partner’s security:

  • SOC II certification
  • System testing and resiliency
  • Penetration testing reports
  • External security audits
  • Documented security controls

3. Composability

Composability is a feature in web3 that enables companies to interact with public, open-source applications, APIs, and smart contracts (i.e. flexible and extensible building blocks that make web3 products easier to build).

When choosing a vendor, consider how well your vendor’s product suite composes with other products and tools you plan to use in your stack (e.g. IDEs, debugging tools, etc).

An infrastructure partner should make it easy to include the specific capabilities that fit your needs without requiring developers to implement every feature. For instance, an end-to-end web3 connectivity provider like Portal enables account management functionality like setting up new users, backup, and recovery options. They also support wallet management flows like sending, receiving, storing, and swapping assets. 

That might be enough for your build, but if you want to build a dapp store, connect to browser-only apps, or integrate natively to protocols, you have the option to do so with Portal’s SDK without additional backend integrations.

4. Feature Roadmap

Blockchain infrastructure platforms are evolving to meet emerging needs of web3 developers, and selecting the right partner should also be based on the partner’s planned roadmap to improving and expanding their product offerings.

Product expansion could include features that expand use cases to new verticals (e.g. exchanges, fintech, cross border payments, self-sovereign identity), or to more niche use cases within existing verticals (e.g. NFT sales, etc.)

The goal of researching the feature set of an infrastructure partner is to determine whether or not they can service your product’s baseline feature set, can scale to meet greater demand, and grow to support expanded use cases.

What questions should companies ask blockchain infrastructure providers?

Questions that companies should ask potential blockchain infra providers fall into a few different categories: team, experience, support, and roadmap.

1. Team, clients, and backers

Before choosing a vendor, ask questions to gauge the quality of the team you are evaluating:

  • What experience does the product engineering team have?
  • What experience does the leadership team have?
  • Who are their current customers and what do they say about them?
  • What kinds of partnerships does the vendor have?
  • Who are the company’s investors and advisors?

2. Quality of technology and developer experience

Before selecting a vendor’s products, ask questions to evaluate the quality of the team’s tech stack:

  • What is the architecture of the technology?
  • Have large customers churned or publicly disclosed negative experiences with the company?
  • Is the technology audited and secure?
  • What is the quality and clarity of the product’s documentation?
  • For Wallet-as-a-Service providers, can users “eject their wallets," (i.e. export their private keys?)

3. Customer support and relationship management

Before entering into an agreement with a software vendor, qualify the team’s ability to support your relationship:

  • What channels does the vendor use to communicate with your teams?
  • Does the team offer direct communication with engineers and technical support staff?
  • Does the company have a robust ticketing, observability, and status reporting system?
  • Is technical support available in a timely manner, particularly when there are severe problems?
  • Is the vendor responsive to feedback and product change requests?

4. Vendor product timeline and roadmap

Before picking a blockchain infra partner, assess the product management team’s product roadmap:

  • What features are being planned in the near-term and long-term?
  • How quickly can a comprehensive product be launched with them?
  • How easily can customers suggest product features and requests?
  • What is the team’s shipping velocity with new products and features?
  • What is the team’s process for releasing products in alpha, beta, and general access phases?

Asking questions of sales leaders, product managers, and engineers while judging the fit of a new blockchain infrastructure partner is essential to getting a web3 product to market.

Additionally, companies should try the products, get demos, read documentation, watch tutorials, and talk to current customers to analyze if the vendor they’re evaluating is the right choice for their use case. Although completing due diligence requires a lot of research and time, a thorough process can save time, money, and resources.

Adding blockchain into your tech stack is an important part of future-proofing any business. In the early 2000’s, it was commonplace to differentiate “internet” companies” from the others, but today all companies use the internet. Similarly, blockchain technology is disruptive to most businesses and most capital markets, which is why applications leveraging it are often referred to as “Web3”.

Blockchain stands to unlock trillions of dollars of illiquid capital into the market as well as provide alternatives to the advertising-centric business model employed by most technology companies. Businesses must choose partners with the experience and knowledge to navigate the opportunities effectively.

This guide aims to help you choose blockchain infrastructure companies that offer comprehensive products to support your business goals and user requirements.

What are the different types of blockchain infrastructure providers companies should evaluate?

Blockchain infrastructure providers offer solutions at every part of the web3 developer stack; from RPC node providers that let engineers read and write to the blockchain to Wallets-as-a-Service providers that give businesses a streamlined way to offer their customers web3 wallets.

1. Wallet Solutions

Wallets give users control of their digital assets and allow them to participate in the web3 economy. With a wallet, people can borrow and lend on DeFi apps, mint and display NFTs, play games, and participate in consumer loyalty and membership programs, all while keeping their assets secure. 

For many years, EOA (“Externally Owned Account”) wallets that rely on seed phrases for recovery have dominated the market; however, new types of wallets that improve the user experience without reducing security and privacy, including Wallet-as-a-Service providers, are gaining a lot of traction. 

Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) MPC wallets, smart contract wallets, and MPC wallets that incorporate Account Abstraction (MPC + AA) offer simpler onboarding for new users by removing the need for recovery phrases and reducing the level of technical knowledge needed to interact with web3.

Account Abstraction: The Most Seamless User Experience

The new Account Abstraction primitive has arrived to ease the transition into web3 - no longer is the onboarding experience plagued by confusing private key requirements that bankrupt forever if you forget your seed phrase.

Solutions such as Alchemy's Account Kit provide all the tools necessary to onboard your users to blockchain without them even knowing: social and passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

With integrations for signers like Portal, enterprises can use Account Kit to create embedded smart wallets that support social login, passkey account recovery, sponsored gas fees, and batched transactions.

2. Custody Solutions

Custodians are third-party vendors that provide secure storage and management of private keys on behalf of individuals and institutions. Custodians offer robust security and technical knowledge to entities that are required to use outside vendors or prefer to pay for key management services instead of managing operations internally. 

Custodians typically use cold storage (i.e. keys are held offline), to reduce attack vectors from hackers, and require institutions to go through KYC and other anti-money laundering checks before they can be onboarded as a customer. 

The availability of custodians—particularly licensed ones—is critical for institutional adoption of web3, as they provide infrastructure and compliance frameworks required by traditional financial institutions. 

3. RPC Node Providers

RPC node providers provide the infrastructure that allows web3 applications to interact with blockchain networks by either querying data or submitting transactions. Although it is possible for anyone to host an RPC node, many solo developers and companies prefer to use enterprise-grade RPC node providers to run and scale the infrastructure.

By offering core APIs, enhanced APIs, and a user-friendly developer platform, RPC node providers simplify the development process, allowing engineers to focus on building applications without worrying about infrastructure.

4. Web3 Development Platform

Building decentralized applications that run on public blockchains requires developers to learn a new set of tools and design patterns, and terminology. Choosing the right vendor as your Blockchain Development platform can accelerate your time to market by combining many developer tools into a single, easy-to-understand user interface. 

If a development platform’s tech stack creates too much friction for engineers, builders may take a long time to build applications, abandon projects, or have a bad developer experience.

What features should be considered when choosing a blockchain infrastructure provider?

The features offered by blockchain infrastructure vendors depend on your product scope and goals. There are a few common areas to evaluate including features that support usability, security, composability, and scalability.

1. Usability

Any blockchain tool you choose for your web3 stack should be easy to learn, simple to use, and robust in its ability to satisfy your intents. Platforms should have clear documentation, a professional user experience, and enterprise-grade functionality to support your team’s goals today and in the future.

2. Organizational Security

Blockchain applications carry new types of risks like protocol risk, smart contract risk, and traditional types of risk like organizational controls. Before signing an agreement with a new vendor, review your prospective partner’s security:

  • SOC II certification
  • System testing and resiliency
  • Penetration testing reports
  • External security audits
  • Documented security controls

3. Composability

Composability is a feature in web3 that enables companies to interact with public, open-source applications, APIs, and smart contracts (i.e. flexible and extensible building blocks that make web3 products easier to build).

When choosing a vendor, consider how well your vendor’s product suite composes with other products and tools you plan to use in your stack (e.g. IDEs, debugging tools, etc).

An infrastructure partner should make it easy to include the specific capabilities that fit your needs without requiring developers to implement every feature. For instance, an end-to-end web3 connectivity provider like Portal enables account management functionality like setting up new users, backup, and recovery options. They also support wallet management flows like sending, receiving, storing, and swapping assets. 

That might be enough for your build, but if you want to build a dapp store, connect to browser-only apps, or integrate natively to protocols, you have the option to do so with Portal’s SDK without additional backend integrations.

4. Feature Roadmap

Blockchain infrastructure platforms are evolving to meet emerging needs of web3 developers, and selecting the right partner should also be based on the partner’s planned roadmap to improving and expanding their product offerings.

Product expansion could include features that expand use cases to new verticals (e.g. exchanges, fintech, cross border payments, self-sovereign identity), or to more niche use cases within existing verticals (e.g. NFT sales, etc.)

The goal of researching the feature set of an infrastructure partner is to determine whether or not they can service your product’s baseline feature set, can scale to meet greater demand, and grow to support expanded use cases.

What questions should companies ask blockchain infrastructure providers?

Questions that companies should ask potential blockchain infra providers fall into a few different categories: team, experience, support, and roadmap.

1. Team, clients, and backers

Before choosing a vendor, ask questions to gauge the quality of the team you are evaluating:

  • What experience does the product engineering team have?
  • What experience does the leadership team have?
  • Who are their current customers and what do they say about them?
  • What kinds of partnerships does the vendor have?
  • Who are the company’s investors and advisors?

2. Quality of technology and developer experience

Before selecting a vendor’s products, ask questions to evaluate the quality of the team’s tech stack:

  • What is the architecture of the technology?
  • Have large customers churned or publicly disclosed negative experiences with the company?
  • Is the technology audited and secure?
  • What is the quality and clarity of the product’s documentation?
  • For Wallet-as-a-Service providers, can users “eject their wallets," (i.e. export their private keys?)

3. Customer support and relationship management

Before entering into an agreement with a software vendor, qualify the team’s ability to support your relationship:

  • What channels does the vendor use to communicate with your teams?
  • Does the team offer direct communication with engineers and technical support staff?
  • Does the company have a robust ticketing, observability, and status reporting system?
  • Is technical support available in a timely manner, particularly when there are severe problems?
  • Is the vendor responsive to feedback and product change requests?

4. Vendor product timeline and roadmap

Before picking a blockchain infra partner, assess the product management team’s product roadmap:

  • What features are being planned in the near-term and long-term?
  • How quickly can a comprehensive product be launched with them?
  • How easily can customers suggest product features and requests?
  • What is the team’s shipping velocity with new products and features?
  • What is the team’s process for releasing products in alpha, beta, and general access phases?

Asking questions of sales leaders, product managers, and engineers while judging the fit of a new blockchain infrastructure partner is essential to getting a web3 product to market.

Additionally, companies should try the products, get demos, read documentation, watch tutorials, and talk to current customers to analyze if the vendor they’re evaluating is the right choice for their use case. Although completing due diligence requires a lot of research and time, a thorough process can save time, money, and resources.

{{building-alchemy-ad}}

Contact Us

Talk to an expert at Alchemy to answer all of your product questions.
Valid number
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Build blockchain magic with Alchemy

Alchemy combines the most powerful web3 developer products and tools with resources, community and legendary support.

Get started for free